Read an Academic Passage

Understanding the Bystander Effect

The bystander effect is a well-documented social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. The likelihood of helping is inversely related to the number of bystanders. This perplexing aspect of human behavior gained significant attention after the widely reported 1964 case of Kitty Genovese in New York City, which prompted extensive research into the factors that influence intervention in emergencies.

Two primary psychological mechanisms are believed to cause the bystander effect. The first is a diffusion of responsibility, where the presence of others makes each individual feel less personally responsible for taking action. People may assume that someone else will intervene. The second mechanism is pluralistic ignorance, a social comparison process where individuals look to others to interpret an ambiguous situation. If no one else is reacting, observers may conclude that no emergency is actually occurring and that no action is needed.

Fortunately, certain conditions can counteract the bystander effect. The effect is reduced when bystanders know one another, as pre-existing social relationships can foster a sense of shared responsibility. Clear and unambiguous emergencies also elicit more help than uncertain ones. Furthermore, singling out a specific individual and giving them a direct command, such as, "You in the blue coat, call for an ambulance," dramatically increases the chance of intervention by removing the diffusion of responsibility.