Read an Academic Passage

The Psychology of the Bystander Effect

The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. Paradoxically, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will intervene. This concept was first explored in depth by social psychologists John Darley and Bibb Latané in the late 1960s, following a highly publicized case where a woman was attacked with no one coming to her aid despite numerous witnesses.

Two key psychological mechanisms contribute to the bystander effect: diffusion of responsibility and social influence. Diffusion of responsibility occurs when observers feel that their personal obligation to act is diminished because others are also present. They assume someone else will, or should, take action. Social influence refers to the tendency for individuals in a group to look to others for cues on how to behave. If no one else is reacting to a seemingly critical situation, it can lead others to interpret it as a non-emergency, thereby reinforcing collective inaction.

Fortunately, understanding the bystander effect is the first step toward counteracting it. Research has shown that individuals who are aware of this psychological tendency are more likely to intervene in an emergency. Furthermore, a proven strategy to overcome the diffusion of responsibility is to single out a specific person from the crowd and give them a direct command. For instance, pointing to someone and saying, "You in the blue coat, call 911," makes that person feel personally responsible and provides a clear course of action, significantly increasing the chances of assistance being rendered.