Read an Academic Passage

Understanding the Bystander Effect

The bystander effect is a social psychological theory stating that individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. The greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. This phenomenon gained widespread attention following the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese in New York City, where reports claimed dozens of people witnessed the crime but failed to intervene or call the police. While the details of that case have been debated, it sparked decades of research into the psychology of inaction.

Two primary factors contribute to the bystander effect. The first is the diffusion of responsibility. When multiple people are present, the personal responsibility to act is shared among them. Each individual feels less compelled to do something, assuming someone else will or should take action. The second factor is social influence. People often look to others for cues on how to behave, especially in ambiguous situations. If no one else is reacting with alarm or taking action, observers may conclude that no help is needed or that intervening would be inappropriate.

Understanding the bystander effect is crucial for promoting prosocial behavior. Studies have shown that simply being aware of this phenomenon can make people more likely to help in an emergency. Furthermore, if one person decides to intervene, it can break the cycle of inaction, encouraging others to assist as well. This suggests that reducing ambiguity by singling out an individual for help (e.g., "You in the red shirt, call for an ambulance!") can effectively overcome the bystander effect and increase the chances of a victim receiving aid.