Read an Academic Passage

The Psychology of the Bystander Effect

The bystander effect is a social psychological theory that states individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. First proposed following the widely reported 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese, where dozens of witnesses reportedly did nothing, the phenomenon highlights a curious aspect of human behavior. The greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will intervene. This is not necessarily due to apathy, but rather to complex psychological processes that occur in group settings.

Two key psychological principles contribute to the bystander effect. The first is the diffusion of responsibility, where the presence of others makes each individual feel less personally responsible for taking action. People may assume that someone else will intervene or has already called for help. The second principle is social influence. Individuals monitor the reactions of others to assess a situation. If no one else is acting concerned, people may interpret the situation as a non-emergency, a state of pluralistic ignorance where everyone is misled by everyone else's inaction.

Fortunately, certain factors can overcome the bystander effect. The likelihood of intervention increases if the emergency is clear and unambiguous. If a bystander knows the victim or feels a sense of shared identity, they are also more likely to help. Furthermore, simply being aware of the bystander effect can empower individuals to act against their initial instincts. Designating a specific person to help—for instance, by pointing and saying, "You, call for an ambulance"—can also break the cycle of inaction by assigning direct responsibility.