Read an Academic Passage

The Psychology of the Bystander Effect

The bystander effect is a social psychological theory that states individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. The greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. This concept was first proposed and studied following the widely reported 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese, where many witnesses supposedly failed to intervene or call for help. The phenomenon suggests that being in a group can inhibit our impulse to assist someone in distress.

Two major factors contribute to the bystander effect. The first is a "diffusion of responsibility," where the presence of others makes each individual feel less personally responsible for taking action. People may assume that someone else will, or should, intervene. The second factor is social influence. Individuals monitor the reactions of those around them to gauge the seriousness of a situation. If no one else is acting concerned, observers might conclude that no emergency exists. This social ambiguity can lead to collective inaction.

Understanding the bystander effect is crucial for fostering a more responsive society. Studies have shown that simply being aware of this phenomenon can make a person more likely to help. Another effective strategy to counter it is to reduce ambiguity by singling out an individual for a specific task, such as saying, "You in the blue coat, please call an ambulance." This assigns direct responsibility and breaks the passive consensus of the group, significantly increasing the chances that the victim will receive aid.